Africa lights up Europe’s energy future
Historically, Europe has relied heavily on a limited number of energy importers.
As former Dutch Prime Minister Mark Rutte prepares to assume the role of NATO Secretary General, he steps into one of the most complex geopolitical landscapes in recent history. NATO faces an array of evolving threats, both traditional and non-traditional, that span different regions of the globe and affect its members in varying degrees. As Rutte takes the helm, he will need to navigate NATO’s evolving priorities and the diverse interests of its European allies while addressing the growing challenges caused by climate change, which increasingly acts as a threat multiplier.
While NATO has historically focused on military threats, it can no longer ignore how environmental changes amplify existing risks. Rising temperatures, sea levels, and extreme weather events are destabilizing fragile regions, from the Middle East to the Arctic. For NATO, addressing climate change is no longer merely about adapting to new battlefield conditions; it is about understanding how environmental instability can drive conflict, reshape global alliances, and threaten security in unpredictable ways. As Secretary General, Rutte will need to ensure that NATO remains agile in responding to these realities, advocating for a more integrated approach that considers the environmental dimensions of security.
For European NATO members, security challenges are as diverse as the continent itself. In the north, melting Arctic ice is opening new sea routes, leading to increased competition over trade pathways and natural resources. While Russia is rapidly expanding its military presence in the Arctic, China is also showing growing interest in the region, heightening tensions and competition.
In the south, countries face large-scale migration flows from North Africa and the Middle East, driven by escalating regional tensions and economic instability. Climate change further exacerbates these challenges, contributing to water scarcity, food insecurity, and more frequent extreme weather events.
Looking eastward, concerns remain deeply focused on the threat of Russian aggression. Since Russia’s annexation of Crimea in 2014 and its full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022, Moscow’s military actions – coupled with cyber and hybrid attacks across the EU – pose a significant threat not only to NATO’s eastern flank but to Europe’s overall security.
Beyond Europe, NATO must also contend with broader geopolitical shifts, particularly the growing alignment between autocratic regimes such as China and Russia, alongside escalating tensions with Iran, Venezuela and North Korea. While China is not officially designated as a direct military threat to NATO, its strengthening ties with Russia – especially in the realms of hybrid warfare and cyber-attacks – present a formidable challenge. China’s continued economic and technological support for Russia complicates NATO’s strategy in dealing with the Ukrainian conflict and highlights the interconnectedness of global challenges. This situation is further convoluted by the uncertainty surrounding future US policy toward Europe.
The results of the upcoming US elections could have far-reaching consequences for NATO. Should the US pivot its focus away from Ukraine and Europe – possibly prioritizing domestic issues or shifting toward a more China-centric foreign policy – Europe would have to bear more responsibility for its collective defence and security. Without robust US support, European NATO members may need to rethink their defence strategies and adopt a more autonomous approach to safeguard their own security. This potential shift underscores the critical need for strategic cohesion within NATO, as any misalignment in priorities could undermine the Alliance’s collective capacity to address shared threats effectively.
As NATO’s next Secretary General, Rutte will face an increasingly fragmented security environment. From Russian aggression to the rising assertiveness of China and the cascading effects of climate change, NATO’s challenges are multifaceted and interwoven. Rutte will need to focus on maintaining the alliance’s unity while encouraging greater burden-sharing among European members, especially if US support should become less reliable. Moreover, he will need to ensure that NATO remains adaptable to the evolving nature of global threats, including those driven by climate change.
*******
Stay tuned for our next blog post, where we will dive into Mark Rutte’s profile. Our piece will feature insights from our Associate Partners who served under the Rutte cabinet. We will explore his defence and security policies and how these experiences could shape his leadership as NATO Secretary General.
Historically, Europe has relied heavily on a limited number of energy importers.
The newly elected European Parliament will shape the EU’s political direction over
As the Netherlands stands on the cusp of a new government and
